CSR And Local Economic Impact

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Dale Tutt

    Industry Strategy Leader @ Siemens, Aerospace Executive, Engineering and Program Leadership | Driving Growth with Digital Solutions

    9,006 followers

    After spending three decades in the aerospace industry, I’ve seen firsthand how crucial it is for different sectors to learn from each other. We no longer can afford to stay stuck in our own bubbles. Take the aerospace industry, for example. They’ve been looking at how car manufacturers automate their factories to improve their own processes. And those racing teams? Their ability to prototype quickly and develop at a breakneck pace is something we can all learn from to speed up our product development. It’s all about breaking down those silos and embracing new ideas from wherever we can find them. When I was leading the Scorpion Jet program, our rapid development – less than two years to develop a new aircraft – caught the attention of a company known for razors and electric shavers. They reached out to us, intrigued by our ability to iterate so quickly, telling me "you developed a new jet faster than we can develop new razors..." They wanted to learn how we managed to streamline our processes. It was quite an unexpected and fascinating experience that underscored the value of looking beyond one’s own industry can lead to significant improvements and efficiencies, even in fields as seemingly unrelated as aerospace and consumer electronics. In today’s fast-paced world, it’s more important than ever for industries to break out of their silos and look to other sectors for fresh ideas and processes. This kind of cross-industry learning not only fosters innovation but also helps stay competitive in a rapidly changing market. For instance, the aerospace industry has been taking cues from car manufacturers to improve factory automation. And the automotive companies are adopting aerospace processes for systems engineering. Meanwhile, both sectors are picking up tips from tech giants like Apple and Google to boost their electronics and software development. And at Siemens, we partner with racing teams. Why? Because their knack for rapid prototyping and fast-paced development is something we can all learn from to speed up our product development cycles. This cross-pollination of ideas is crucial as industries evolve and integrate more advanced technologies. By exploring best practices from other industries, companies can find innovative new ways to improve their processes and products. After all, how can someone think outside the box, if they are only looking in the box? If you are interested in learning more, I suggest checking out this article by my colleagues Todd Tuthill and Nand Kochhar where they take a closer look at how cross-industry learning are key to developing advanced air mobility solutions. https://lnkd.in/dK3U6pJf

  • View profile for Danielle Valle Gilchrist

    Social Impact & Customer Success Leader | Advancing Purpose-Driven Strategy, Partner Retention & Capacity Building | Personal Growth | Speaker & Thought Leadership Contributor

    5,536 followers

    We don’t need another volunteer day. We don’t need another group photo in matching t-shirts. We need to stop pretending that painting the same fence five times has an impact. When I ran a corporate volunteer program, May was our “Month of Giving.” I started planning in January. Hundreds of events across the state, coordinated by incredible volunteer champions. Engagement scores went up. Spirits were high. But a question nagged at me: who was this really serving? Too often, these events are performative philanthropy, designed to make employees feel good, not to make a difference. Nonprofits spend more time hosting us than being helped by us. If we’re serious about impact, we need to move beyond one-day volunteering. 💥 Invest in skill-based projects. 💥 Build long-term partnerships. 💥 Ask nonprofits what they actually need. Let’s stop measuring success by participation rates and start measuring it by what changes when we show up. Who’s ready to rethink corporate volunteering? #CSR #CorporateVolunteering #EmployeeEngagement #SocialImpact #ESG #Leadership

  • View profile for Marian Salzman

    SVP Corporate Development at Philip Morris International | Provocative Strategist | Trend Forecaster Emeritus | Global Brand Builder | Reinvention Champion | Inveterate Connector

    24,880 followers

    When I took on my role as Chief Corporate Citizenship Officer at PMI, I set a handful of parameters for myself and my team: 1. Don’t fall into the trap of arm’s-length checkbook philanthropy: One-off cash infusions can help nonprofits in the immediate term, but they don’t get at the issue of sustainable growth. 2. Focus, focus, focus: Diffusion is the enemy of progress. There are an endless number of worthy causes and charitable organizations, but our greatest impact will come from identifying a small number of causes that are intrinsically tied to our values and vision and making those causes priorities. (In our case, this is U.S. military veterans, women’s equity and empowerment, and hyperlocal activations.) 3. Empower—and learn from—those already in the trenches: We’re not going to dictate what happens at the community level. We’re here to listen and learn and find ways to support and expand the good works already underway. 4. Give a “hand up” instead of a handout: Band-Aid solutions may make us feel good in the short term, but they don’t get to the root problem. The cash infusions we give our community-based partners are meaningful, but their value grows exponentially when paired with our business expertise and insights. 5. Offer employees a chance to contribute to change: We polled PMI’s U.S. workforce earlier this year about our plans to support military veterans. An astonishing 97 percent of employees raised their hands to get involved. There’s a hunger out there for making a positive difference in local communities and the broader world. Find ways to connect your people to the issues that matter most to them. It turns out that this is the way the next generation of philanthropists is thinking about their impact as well. A recent article (I’ll share the link in comments) shares interesting insights into how our younger generations—millennials and Gen Z—are embracing a more comprehensive approach to philanthropy focused on measurable impact and deeper connections. They’re also showing a greater tolerance for the “long game,” willing to take risks in the short term to lay the groundwork for greater gains down the road. As the next generation of philanthropists takes the reins and starts investing more than money in the causes they care about, let’s make sure our organizations are prepared to do the same.

  • View profile for Ajit Sivaram
    Ajit Sivaram Ajit Sivaram is an Influencer

    Co-founder @ U&I | Building Scalable CSR & Volunteering Partnerships with 100+ Companies Co-founder @ Change+ | Leadership Transformation for Senior Teams & Culture-Driven Companies

    35,506 followers

    Corporate volunteering in India is at a crossroads—caught between good intentions and shallow execution. We've mastered the art of taking smiling group photos at beach cleanups while our actual volunteering numbers flatline at 29%. That's the median participation rate across Indian companies. Let that sink in. Only 22% of Indian companies offer paid Volunteer Time Off. In America, it's 66%. This isn't about comparing countries. It's about confronting our corporate hypocrisy. We don't have a volunteering problem. We have a sustainability problem. The pattern is painfully predictable. A new CSR initiative launches with fanfare. Leadership speeches. Emotional videos. Sign-up sheets circulating with enthusiasm. The first event is packed - everyone wants to be seen, everyone wants to belong. Photos flood the company WhatsApp groups. LinkedIn posts celebrate the "culture of giving back." Then reality sets in. The second event gets half the attendance. By the third, it's just the usual suspects - the genuinely committed few who show up while everyone else finds convenient excuses. "Too much work." "Family commitment." "Next time pakka." Post-COVID, we saw a temporary surge in volunteering interest. People emerged from isolation hungry for meaning, for connection. But that wave has crashed. We're back to the same old cycle of initial enthusiasm followed by institutional abandonment. Here's the uncomfortable truth: we've built volunteering programs designed to fail. We treat them as events, not culture. As photo opportunities, not purpose. As checkboxes, not change-makers. We expect employees to care deeply about causes the company itself only cares about quarterly. Real volunteering isn't about painting walls once a year. It's about building bridges that last. It's not about the hours logged but the relationships formed. The transformation witnessed. The problems understood, not just addressed. Companies that get this right don't just offer time off for volunteering - they weave it into their identity. They match skills with needs. They celebrate impact, not just participation. They make volunteering accessible, meaningful, and yes, even career-enhancing. Because when volunteering becomes part of how you work, not just what you do after work, the 29% becomes 59%. The token becomes transformation. So stop launching new volunteering initiatives. Start building volunteering infrastructure. Stop asking why employees don't care. Start showing them that you do. The difference between performative giving and transformative impact isn't in the budget. It's in the belief that doing good should be as fundamental to your business as doing well. Everything else is just a beach cleanup waiting to be forgotten. If you’re rethinking your company’s volunteering culture, DM me—let’s build something that lasts. #CSR #U&I #CorporateVolunteering

  • View profile for Raoul Ruparel OBE

    Senior Director of BCG’s Centre for Growth

    4,045 followers

    The UK is home to world-class research and scientific talent – but we’re leaving huge untapped value on the table when it comes to healthcare innovation. Our new report shows that changing this could be transformative for both patient health outcomes and the economy. If the UK matched peers such as Denmark or the US in turning R&D excellence into commercial and clinical success, we could add £78 billion to GDP by 2030 – a 76% uplift on current projections. In some areas, such as health tech, even just matching peers with emerging sectors in this space, such as Italy and Spain, would see the UK unlock significant additional value. To show what’s at stake, we analysed four high-burden conditions – cardiometabolic disease, musculoskeletal disorders, mental health and cancer. Scaling proven innovations across these areas could generate £17 billion in annual workforce productivity gains and £3 billion in NHS savings every year. Importantly, unlocking this value is not about being ‘world leading’ or at the forefront of developing innovations; it is simply about scaling proven treatments, as other countries are already doing. At a time when we desperately need to drive economic growth and fiscal savings, this is relatively low-hanging fruit.   So, what’s holding the UK back? We identified four systemic barriers in healthcare innovation: 🔷 Limited workforce capacity and digital skills within the NHS 🔷 Fragmented and siloed data systems 🔷 Weak cross-sector collaboration 🔷 Regulation and policy that too often constrain rather than enable innovation. The report outlines three priorities for action to unlock innovation: 1️⃣ Strengthen the NHS as an innovation platform – with a clear national strategy, pathways to scale and investment in digital capability. 2️⃣ Facilitate cross-sector collaboration – connecting academia, industry and the NHS through coordinated hubs and partnerships. 3️⃣ Incentivise innovation – through smarter regulation, R&D tax credits and IP frameworks that reward impact. Delivering this vision will require collaboration between the NHS, government, regulators and industry – but the prize is clear: a stronger NHS, a more productive economy and better outcomes for millions of patients. Read the full report: https://lnkd.in/eEHky9Jc

  • View profile for Dr Sunita Gandhi
    Dr Sunita Gandhi Dr Sunita Gandhi is an Influencer

    Transforming Global Education & Literacy | Founder, Dignity Education Vision International | Author & Education Leader | Former World Bank Economist | PhD Physics (Cambridge)

    18,033 followers

    Your employees are one of the most underused CSR assets you have. Not their wallets or their names on a donor wall. It’s their skills, their time and their stories. Employee volunteerism in education is still treated like a nice-to-have at most companies. A feel-good day or a team photo at a school. That's not volunteerism, that's optics. Real impact looks different. A data analyst teaching a class on Excel to high schoolers and staying in touch as a mentor. A product manager running a mock interview series for college seniors. An engineer co-designing a STEM project with a teacher, not just funding it. When employees bring their actual expertise into classrooms, two things happen. One, students get a window into careers they didn't know existed and two, employees rediscover why their work matters. The companies winning at this aren't just giving employees paid volunteer days. They're building structured programs with school partnerships, clear curricula, and follow-through that lasts beyond a single visit. If your CSR strategy includes education, ask yourself, are your people involved, or just your budget? The answer makes all the difference.

  • View profile for Amir M. Sharif

    I translate the complexity of the world for you. Head,Norwich Business School | Experienced Dean | Board Member | Researcher/Academic Mentor (systems thinking,circular economy,AI) | Accreditation | Industry practitioner

    7,240 followers

    UK Government Modern Industrial Strategy launched in the last 24 hours: what does it mean? I’ve been exploring this using #systemsthinking and a causal loop diagram (CLD) to map its feedback structures. A few key takeaways which might be relevant #business schools… Systemic Insights via CLD: – Investment → R\&D → Innovation → Productivity → Economic Growth → Investment – Skills ↔ Innovation & Infrastructure → Tech Adoption → Innovation → Productivity Key “hubs” include **Innovation**, **Productivity**, & **Economic Growth**, with **Collaboration** and **Skills** as powerful levers. Negative links (e.g., regulatory uncertainty) can weaken investment, while peripheral nodes (e.g., Net-Zero in our simplified map) may need stronger connections to reflect real-world influence. This underscores the need for aligning R&D, #skills, infrastructure, and #sustainability objectives. So, what should business schools do? 🤝 Strengthen Industry Partnerships: Collaborate with firms & regional clusters on real projects. Connect students/faculty to innovation initiatives, boosting learning and local impact. 💡 Focus on Emerging Skills: Update programs for digital literacy, clean-energy management, & advanced manufacturing basics. Equip grads with in-demand skills that feed productivity and innovation loops. 🚀 Foster Entrepreneurship & Scale-Ups: Offer incubators, mentorship, and finance guidance. “Entrepreneurship → Scale-ups → Innovation” will help startups grow and energize the wider economy 🤝🔬Promote Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration: Bridge business, engineering, sustainability, etc. Joint projects mirror how “Collaboration → Innovation/Skills/Infrastructure” drives broader outcomes. 📜 Short Courses on Policy Signals: Run workshops on navigating regulatory certainty/uncertainty. Helping leaders anticipate policy shifts reduces investment hesitation. 🌍 Champion Regional Engagement: Partner with local authorities & SMEs to tailor programs to regional needs. Reinforce “Regional Clusters → Growth → Inclusive Growth” and support levelling-up. ♻️ Embed Sustainability & Net-Zero Goals: Integrate clean energy case studies & net zero strategy in courses. Aligns with “Net-Zero → Clean Energy → Investment/Innovation,” preparing leaders for green transitions. 📊 Leverage Data & Analytics: Track outcomes of partnerships, alumni ventures, and skills placement. Measurable impact reinforces further investment and collaboration. 🌐 Build Innovation-Focused Alumni Networks : Create forums where grads in high-growth sectors share insights with current students. Sustains knowledge transfer and industry connections. #IndustrialStrategy #SystemsThinking #Innovation #EconomicGrowth #UK #CLD #Policy #Sustainability #Collaboration #Skills

  • View profile for Linda Munyengeterwa

    Global Director, World Bank Group | Public-Private Partnerships & Advisory, Corporate Finance |

    5,958 followers

    Investing in Leadership to Deliver Better Public Private Partnerships In emerging markets, the infrastructure gap remains a great barrier to sustainable growth. While public-private partnerships (PPPs) have the potential to unlock private capital, innovation, and operational expertise, their success depends on the strength of the public institutions behind them. I was honored to support IFC - International Finance Corporation’s collaboration with the Stanford Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law in launching the first cohort of the PPP Executive Leadership Program—a pioneering initiative focused not only on transactions and technical know-how, but on developing the leadership capacity needed to deliver sustainable infrastructure at scale. Held over five days at Stanford University, the program brought together senior officials from across the globe for a learning experience at the intersection of policy, governance, and infrastructure delivery. Three Takeaways  1. Public Policy Is the Foundation of Private sector Success Private sector performance is inseparable from public policy and governance. Without clear, transparent, and stable policy frameworks, even the most innovative, well-financed projects can falter. However, when public institutions are strong, accountable, and well-organized, they provide the foundation for effective PPPs, and by extension, sustainable economic growth.  2️. Leadership Is as Important as Technical Expertise  PPP professionals often focus on deal structure, procurement frameworks, or risk allocation models—technical skills alone are not enough. Strategic, adaptive leadership is what turns frameworks into results. Through simulation exercises, case studies, and interactive lectures, participants explored how to navigate real-world complexities: managing political risk, aligning stakeholders, and making trade-offs. The ability to lead through uncertainty and build coalitions is key to successful PPPs.  3️. True Partnership Requires Shared Purpose and Trust  The program reinforced that PPPs are more than contracts, they are relationships. Relationships between governments and investors, regulators and operators, and infrastructure providers and the people they serve. We are grateful to the Stanford Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law faculty and team led by Francis Fukuyama and Michael Bennon, for their thought leadership and vision in creating this one-of-a-kind program. Thank you to the participants of this inaugural cohort. I look forward to seeing the impact you will make as PPP champions in your respective countries. IFC Transaction Advisory is committed to partnering with governments, academia, and private sector to build institutional capacity and deliver sustainable, high-impact PPPs.     #PPP #Infrastructure #PublicLeadership #Governance #StanfordCDDRL #IFCAdvisory  #CapacityBuilding   #SustainableDevelopment  #EmergingMarkets #IFCPPPs #PublicPrivatePartnerships   

  • View profile for Himani Kanwal

    Supply Chain and Operations Strategy & Transformation Leader | Ex-J&J, BP, Castrol, Mondelez | FMCG, Healthcare, Retail | Building Future-Ready Supply Chains | Dubai, UAE |

    11,971 followers

    If Apple did all its hiring only from BlackBerry or Nokia, would the iPhone even exist in its current form? Unlikely. Innovation rarely thrives in echo chambers. So why do so many leaders insist on hiring only from within their own industry, especially in supply chain, where adaptability is everything? After 20+ years leading supply chains across FMCG, Foods, Automotive, and Medical Devices, I’ve seen a puzzling paradox: companies seek transformation but screen out the very people who could deliver those with cross-industry experience. Yes, every industry has its nuances. But supply chain fundamentals—demand planning, inventory optimization, risk management, supplier relationships—are highly transferable. More importantly, cross-pollination brings powerful perspectives. Here’s what they’re missing: ·       Pharma’s production efficiency is powered by automotive’s lean manufacturing. ·       Tech’s rapid launch cycles are inspired by fashion’s fast-cycle forecasting. ·       Food safety protocols strengthened through healthcare’s traceability standards. Still, most leaders default to familiarity over foresight. In a world defined by volatility and complexity, fresh thinking is a requirement. Leaders who’ve navigated multiple sectors bring the agility, curiosity, and strategic breadth needed to build future-ready supply chains. If you're hiring for growth, stop looking in the rear-view mirror. The future is being built by those who think across borders—and industries. Are you still hiring your supply chain team from your own industry or you build diverse teams mindfully? #SupplyChainLeadership #TalentStrategy #CrossIndustryThinking #FutureOfWork #SupplyChainTransformation

  • View profile for Nick Thomas

    Helping charities find remarkable employees 🤝 Trustee of Our Street Our Children 🌏 Coffee Purist ☕ Vinyl over Spotify 🎵

    8,695 followers

    Many organisations offer their employees paid one-off volunteering days. This sounds great on paper. The intention is brilliant. But the truth is, this RARELY helps charities. In fact, it often causes their staff team MORE work. Not exactly the impact you're hoping for. I know this from personal experience. One-day corporate visits are logistically challenging to make genuinely useful. What charities actually need is Commitment. Consistency. Real partnership. But the good news is it's absolutely possible. It starts with a conversation. Ask the charity: What do you actually need? What can we realistically facilitate? Not what we assume they need. What they actually need. Here are five helpful alternatives to one-day per year volunteering: 1. Weekly telephone befriending calls: 30 minutes per week. Your employees enrich the lives of isolated and lonely people, all from their desk. Consider a local Age UK charity or similar. 2. Half-day monthly support: Regular, predictable help. Food banks. Clothes banks. Community gardening. Environmental cleanups. Charities can actually plan knowing you're coming. It means something. 3. Evening and weekend volunteering with TOIL: Let your employees volunteer when charities actually need them, such as weekend fundraising events. You give them time off in the week. Everyone wins. The charity gets help when it matters most. 4. Offer a set amount of paid hours a year for volunteering that can be used flexibly: Such as give employees 48 hours per year to offer a charity. Let an employee and charity plan volunteering around that. 5. Skilled volunteering: Send brains, not just bodies. Marketing. Website work. Legal. Strategy. Don't waste your employee's expertise on practical tasks alone. (Your finance director's knowledge is worth more than their ability to move boxes). This Volunteers Week, could you pitch one of these to your workplace? Or if you work for a charity, share what would actually help you most? I'll share five more alternative ideas tomorrow 🙌

Explore categories