š„ āJingjin, have you ever considered that women are just inferior to men?ā That was her opening line. The lady who challenged me was not a traditionalist in pearls. She was one of the top investment bankers of her time, closed billion-dollar deals, led global teams, the kind of woman whose voice dropped ten degrees when money was on the line. And she meant it. āBack in my day, if I had to hire, Iād always go for the man. No pregnancy leave. No PMS. No emotional volatility. Just less⦠liability.ā And she doesnāt believe in what I do. Helping women lead from a place of wholeness. Because to her, wholeness is a luxury. Winning requires neutrality. And neutrality means: be less female and suck it up! Iāve heard versions of this many times, and too often, from high-performing women who "made it" by suppressing. But facts are: š§ There are no consistent brain differences between men and women that explain menās ālogicā or womenās āemotions.ā š„ Hormones impact everyone. Menās testosterone drops when they nurture. Womenās cortisol rises in toxic workplaces, not because theyāre weak, but because theyāre sane. š What we call āmeritocracyā is often a reward system for those who can perform like they have no body, no children, no cycles. None of those are biologically male traits. Theyāre artifacts of a system built around male lives. So, if you're a woman who's bought into this logic, here are some counter-strategies: š 1. Study Systems Like You Studied Deals Dissect the incentives, norms, and bias loops of your workplace the same way youād break down a P&L. Donāt internalize whatās structural. š§ 2. Redefine Strategic Strengths Stop mirroring alpha aggression to prove you belong. Deep listening, self-regulation, and nuance reading, these are leadership assets, not soft skills. Use them ruthlessly. š¬ 3. Name It, Donāt Numb It If your hormones impact you one day a month, say so, but also say what it doesnāt mean: It doesnāt cancel out 29 days of clarity, strategy, and execution. šŖ© 4. Build Your Own Meritocracy Start investing in spaces, networks, and cultures where your wholeness isnāt penalized. If none exist, build them. š§± 5. Deconstruct Before You Self-Doubt When you catch yourself thinking āmaybe Iām not built for this,ā pause. Ask: Whose rules am I trying to win by? Who benefits when I question myself? This post isnāt about defending women. We donāt need defending. Itās about calling out the internalised metrics we still use to measure ourselves. š And choosing to rewrite them. Whatās the most 'rational' reason youāve heard for why women are a liability?
Workplace Gender Differences
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
Intimidating is not another word for assertive. Difficult is not another way to say problem solver. Outspoken is not a substitute for courage to speak up. Direct is not how to describe being able to tackle conflict head on. Cold doesnāt equate to confident. Early in my career, I was accused of being too soft, not confident enough, and too feminine (whatever that means). So, I had to practice being a clear and real-time problem solver. I had to become more assertive to be seen and heard. I had to find the courage to speak up in a sea of faces and genders that looked nothing like mine. I had to be direct to deal with conflict situations. And Iāve had to calm my nerves to have the outward appearance of confidence. I have seen too often that women in leadership roles, who display the same characteristics as a strong male counterpart, are viewed differently. But, I just donāt understand why. All the women I know in senior positions have at some point been accused of being intimidating, difficult, too direct, cold and too outspoken. And it baffles us all because we arenāt trying to be those things. We are simply trying to effectively lead (with the same leadership traits every mba or exec. course teaches). Itās time to lose these labels; they are unfair, unattractive, demoralizing and sexist. That woman you might call ādifficultā has likely had to work twice as hard over her career just to be seen, heard and, if sheās lucky, respected.
-
I once got feedback that I was āintimidating.ā I took it to heart. I spent the next few years trying to be as approachable, warm, and agreeable as I could be. I assumed this was a character flaw that I needed to fix. But years later, I realized something: this feedback wasnāt about me. It was about the system - one that judges women more harshly and polices their personalities more than their performance. And the numbers back this up. šš½ šÆ Women are 7x more likely to receive negative personality-based feedback than men. šÆ 56% of women have been called "unlikeable" in reviews (vs. 16% of men). šÆ Harvard Business Review found that 76% of āaggressiveā labels in one companyās reviews were given to women (vs. 24% to men). This Is the Leadership Double Bind: Speak up? Youāre ātoo aggressive.ā Stay quiet? You ālack confidence.ā Show ambition? Youāre āunlikeable.ā Ask for a promotion? Youāre ātoo pushy.ā And hereās the kicker - itās worst for high-performing women. This is why women... ā³Ā Hesitate to showcase ambition. ā³Ā Are reluctant to ask for opportunities. ā³Ā Are leaving workplaces faster than others. So, what can we do? Here are 3 ways we can start changing this narrative today: ā Check your language. Is the feedback about personality or performance? If you wouldnāt give the same critique to a man, please reconsider. ā Challenge vague feedback. āYou need to be more confidentā isnāt actionable. Women deserve the same clear, growth-oriented feedback as men. ā Support womenās ambition. If certain leadership traits (ex. being assertive) are seen as strengths in men, they should be seen as strengths in women too. Have you ever received unfair feedback? Whatās one piece of feedback youāve had to unlearn? šš½ ā»ļø Please share to help end unfair feedback. š Follow Bhavna Toor (She/Her) for more insights on conscious leadership. Source: Textio 'Language Bias in Feedback' Study, 2023 & 2024 #EndUnFairFeedback #IWD2025
-
āI donāt fear my feelings anymore.ā When she said that in our last session, I felt the weight of how far she had come. Because this was the same high-performing woman who once told me: āI can handle board meetings⦠but I canāt handle feeling not enough.ā On paper, she was exceptional. Strong career trajectory. Many high achiever awards Respected in her field. Consistently delivering results. But internally? Rejection from friends would stay with her for days. A delayed reply felt like exclusion. Someone else being appreciated triggered quiet comparison. Her own achievements went unnoticed ā and she shrank. The voice in her head was relentless: āYou should be better.ā āYou should be stronger.ā āWhy does this still affect you?ā Add to that the weight of expectations. From parents. From culture. From herself. She wasnāt just chasing goals. She was chasing approval. And when approval didnāt come ā it felt like failure. So she coped the only way she knew how: Overworking. Overgiving. Overachieving. Pretending she wasnāt hurt. High performer outside. Emotionally exhausted inside. No one had ever taught her what to do with feelings like rejection, comparison, invisibility. So she either drowned in them⦠or pushed them down. In our recent session she said: āNow when I feel rejected or small, I donāt spiral. I pause. I name it. I park it. I choose how to respond.ā That is emotional fitness. Not becoming emotionless. Not pretending rejection doesnāt hurt. Not eliminating ambition. But learning to: ⢠Separate feeling from identity ⢠Regulate before reacting ⢠Stop outsourcing self-worth ⢠Celebrate your own wins ⢠Allow someone elseās success without shrinking yourself Her achievements didnāt suddenly get louder. Her inner critic got quieter. She stopped losing days to āIām not enough.ā She stopped turning someone elseās spotlight into her shadow. And that shift changes everything. Because hereās the truth: Many high performers arenāt struggling with competence. Theyāre struggling with unprocessed emotion. Rejection hurts. Comparison triggers. Unmet expectations sting. That doesnāt make you weak. It makes you human. But if you donāt train your response, those emotions start running your leadership, your relationships, your confidence. So let me ask you: Where are you still seeking approval instead of building self-trust? If youāre ready to stop feeling small in moments that donāt define you ā and start leading from emotional strength ā letās connect. Because success feels very different when you no longer measure your worth through someone elseās validation. #EmotionalFitness #HighPerformance #EmotionalIntelligence #LeadershipDevelopment #WomenInLeadership #SelfWorth #ResilientLeadership #NervousSystemRegulation #ExecutivePresence #PersonalGrowth #ConfidenceBuilding #SelfLeadership
-
After 12 years in recruitment, Iāve noticed something uncomfortable. Some of the most capable women in the room quietly hold themselves back. Not because they lack talent or ambition. But because they follow habits that feel responsible yet slowly limit their influence, income and opportunities. Over time, those habits create gaps in seniority, pay and visibility. The women who thrive in the next era of work wonāt be the hardest working. Theyāll be the most strategic about how they show up. In today's video, I share 4 of the most expensive career mistakes I see senior career women make and how to shift them. 1. Waiting until youāre 100% ready Women tend to apply when they meet almost every requirement, whereas Men tend to apply when they meet around 60%. That gap alone changes career trajectories. The shift: Stop asking āAm I fully ready?ā Start asking, āAm I capable of learning the rest?ā If youāre 60% aligned, it may already be a stretch opportunity worth stepping into. 2. Shrinking impact with language This shows up as humility, but at senior levels it reads as uncertainty. āI helped withā¦ā āI supportedā¦ā āI was involved inā¦ā The shift: Be precise about your contribution. āI led.ā āI delivered.ā āI drove.ā Clarity builds credibility. 3. Assuming your work will speak for itself Many high-performing women believe that if they deliver great work, recognition will follow. But at senior levels, visibility and positioning matter just as much as output. The person holding everything together often gets labelled reliable rather than strategic. The shift: Donāt assume people understand the complexity of what youāve done. Make the invisible visible. 4. Letting your network go cold Networking often feels optional when you're busy delivering. But the women who move fastest during restructures, AI shifts, or new opportunities all have one thing in common: Warm networks. The shift: Build relationships in seasons of stability, so you have options in seasons of change. None of these patterns means youāre doing something wrong. They simply mean youāve been playing the game the way many women were taught to. But the rules of careers are changing. The women who understand the strategy behind visibility, positioning and opportunity will create far more leverage over the next decade. I hope you enjoy the video. Save this for later and reshare ā»ļø so more women can get ahead in the age of AI.
-
I recently coached an executive who was thinking hard about whether to ask for a promotion. She hesitated, caught between ambition and doubt. āI donāt want to seem pushy,ā she admitted. āBut if I donāt ask, I might be waiting forever.ā I shared insights from a Harvard Business Review article that talks about the myths that often hold women back in negotiations. Many of us have been taught to believe that men negotiate more than women, that women must always negotiate pay, or that backlash is inevitable when they do. These myths are misleading and, worse, they reinforce outdated gender norms that limit opportunities. (1) Myth #1: Men Negotiate, Women Donāt Both men and women negotiateābut for different things. Research shows that women negotiate roles, flexibility, and workload as often as men negotiate pay and job offers. The real issue isnāt whether women negotiate, but whether they are met with more resistance when they do. (2) Myth #2: Women Should Always Negotiate Pay The gender wage gap is not just about pay differencesāitās about the types of jobs men and women hold. While women should absolutely advocate for fair pay, supporting their advancement into leadership roles has an even greater impact on closing the wage gap. (3) Myth #3: Backlash Is Inevitable Many women worry that advocating for themselves will make them seem aggressive or unlikeable. While bias exists, leaders can shift the narrative by educating managers and themselves, encouraging broader career negotiations (beyond pay), and normalizing womenās ambition. After talking through these myths and ideas, the executive decided to go ahead and ask for that promotion. But she didnāt just walk in and demand it. Instead, she framed her request strategically: She led with facts ā She highlighted her results: āIāve exceeded my targets for the past two years and led initiatives that were really beneficial to the firm.ā (She backed this up with data and quantified the benefits.) She made it a win-win ā āWith a VP title, I can expand our client base and strengthen key partnerships.ā She asked with confidence ā Not āWould you consider it?ā but āWhat would it take to make this happen?ā She got the promotion. More importantly, she walked away feeling empowered, knowing she had advocated for herself effectively. We are in a unique moment where work is being redefined. If we want to create a more equitable future, we must challenge these outdated myths and reshape how we think about negotiation. #Leadership #Negotiation #CareerGrowth #WomenAtWork #Learning #Confidence https://lnkd.in/eZchz7jN
-
Question for Black women in the workplace, do you ever experience the weight of unrealistic expectations, often at the expense of your mental health? This phenomenon is known as the Black Superwoman Schema, a term coined by Dr. Cheryl L. Woods-Giscombe. It includes five key behaviors commonly exhibited by Black women leaders: 1. Obligation to manifest strength 2. Obligation to suppress emotions 3. Resistance to being vulnerable or dependent 4. Determination to succeed despite significantly limited resources 5. An obligation to help others Time and time again, Iāve seen this play out in our emotional wellbeing being dismissed and our value being overlooked, no matter how hard we work or support our colleagues. Letās talk about how we can dismantle this harmful notion in professional settings: 1. Adjust your own expectations. I encourage the high-achieving women I coach to ask themselves, is this serving others at the expense of my own benefit? Is this weight mine to carry alone? When we set goals or standards that are too high, we may constantly feel pressure to meet them, leading to burnout. (And listen, weāre saying no to burnout all 2024!) 2. Ask for help. Itās easy for us to say āI got thisā, or āI can handle it on my ownā. This is your reminder that itās okay to ask for support and be clear on what that can look like. Itās not a weakness to ask for support. 3. Know when to say "no." The ability to say ānoā is your sacred right. 4. Create a self-care plan. What are your non-negotiable rules around caring for your health no matter what remains undone? Because we canāt take care of others if weāre not doing it for ourselves. 5. Prioritize, deprioritize, and reprioritize your workload as often as you need to. Prioritize your obligations based on significance or impact for you rather than external factors. What else would you add to this list? How do you manage unrealistic expectations in the workplace? #MentalHealthAwareness #MentalHealth #Mindfulness #Selfcare
-
During my time in the corporate world, there was one thing I learned early: Being strong, decisive, and ambitious as a woman made people uncomfortable. I was praised for performance and questioned for assertiveness which was necessary for leadership. I delivered results, but the feedback was always, āLetās tweak your messagingā or āLet's fix Xā, whatever āXā was, meanwhile, my male counterparts saying the same things, in the same rooms were called visionary. So when I came across the Heidi vs. Howard case study from Columbia, I didnāt need a research paper to tell me what I already knew in my bones: Most people still donāt like strong women. In 2003, Professor Frank Flynn ran a case study at Columbia. Same story, same resume, same success one name: Heidi Roizen. The other: Howard Roizen. Both were rated as competent. But only Howard was likable. Heidi was considered too aggressive and not someone youād want to work with by some students (both males and females). Lead, and be labeled. Play small, and be passed over. We need to fix the system because it was never designed to support women in the workplace.
-
High-performing women donāt struggle with capability. They struggle with recognition. Especially at work. Today is international women's day. But many brilliant women are still navigating the same invisible barriers every week. š Your idea gets ignored in a meeting⦠then praised when someone else repeats it. š You deliver consistent results⦠but get labelled āreliableā instead of āleadership material.ā š You carry the team quietly⦠while someone else presents the results. This is the hidden reality for many high-performing women. Not a lack of skill. But a lack of recognition, positioning, and influence. So today, instead of just celebrating, hereās a small Womenās Day gift š for every woman navigating rooms like these. A few power sentences you can use when your voice needs to land. š When your idea gets repeated by someone else āThanks for building on the point I mentioned earlier. The key piece I want to emphasize isā¦ā š When your contribution is overlooked āIād like to add one piece to that. The approach I suggested earlier could help us solve this.ā š When you want to reinforce your ownership āBased on the work Iāve been leading on this project, hereās what Iām seeingā¦ā š When you want to position your thinking as leadership āOne strategic risk we should consider here isā¦ā Small shifts in language. But they quietly reclaim space, visibility, and authority in the room. And these are only a few from a much bigger āVoice & influence playbookā Iāve been building for high-performing women at work. Comment āPLAYBOOKā if you want me to post the entire playbook here on LinkedIn. Because the goal isnāt just to work hard. Itās to make sure your voice shapes the conversation. Happy international womenās day to the women leading, building, and quietly changing the way work works.