Microsoft just promoted 4 sales leaders to EVP. The press release buried the real story. One line stood out: "Keep the feedback loop between customers and product decisions as small as possible." Read that again. Microsoft—a company with 220,000 employees—is restructuring its entire sales leadership to shrink the distance between what customers need and what product builds. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗖𝗥𝗢𝘀: Microsoft isn't doing this for fun. They're doing it because "AI is being adopted at extraordinary speed, and customers expect these capabilities to come to life in their business faster than ever before." Translation: The old model—sales captures feedback, passes it to product, product builds it 18 months later—is dead. Customers won't wait. Competitors won't wait. Your org structure can't wait either. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗽 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝗮𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗿𝗴𝘀: • Reps hear what customers actually need • That insight gets buried in CRM notes nobody reads • Product builds features based on internal roadmaps • Customers churn because their problems never get solved • Everyone blames "alignment issues" The loop is too long. The signal gets lost. Deals die in the gap. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗼𝗳𝘁 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀: When you elevate sales leaders to EVP and give them direct lines to product strategy, you're not just promoting people. You're compressing the feedback loop by design. Customer pain → Sales leadership → Product decision. No 6-month committee reviews. No "we'll add it to the backlog." No lost-in-translation moments. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗥𝗢 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: How long does it take for customer feedback from your sellers to influence a product decision at your company? If the answer is "months" or "I don't know," your feedback loop is a competitive liability. The companies winning in AI aren't just deploying faster. They're learning faster. And learning speed is a function of feedback loop length. How compressed is your customer-to-product feedback loop?
User Experience Strategy Workshops
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
Every company says they listen to customers. But most just hear them. There's a difference. After spending years building feedback loops, here's what I've learned: Feedback isn't about collecting data. It's about creating change. Most companies fail at feedback because: - They send random surveys - They collect scattered feedback - They store insights in silos - They never close the loop The result? Frustrated customers. Missed opportunities. Lost revenue. Here's how to build real feedback loops: 1. Gather feedback intelligently - NPS isn't enough - CSAT tells half the story - One channel never works Instead: - Run targeted post-interaction surveys - Conduct deep-dive customer interviews - Analyze product usage patterns - Monitor support conversations - Build customer advisory boards - Track social mentions 2. Create a single source of truth - Consolidate feedback from everywhere - Tag and categorize insights - Track trends over time - Make it accessible to everyone 3. Turn feedback into action - Prioritize based on impact - Align with business goals - Create clear ownership - Set implementation timelines But here's the most important part: Close the loop. When customers give feedback: - Acknowledge it immediately - Update them on progress - Show them implemented changes - Demonstrate their impact The biggest mistakes I see: Feedback Overload: - Collecting too much data - No clear action plan - Analysis paralysis Biased Collection: - Listening to the loudest voices - Ignoring silent majority - Over-indexing on complaints Slow Response: - Taking months to act - No progress updates - Lost customer trust Remember: Good feedback loops aren't about tools. They're about trust. Every piece of feedback is a customer saying: "I care enough to help you improve." Don't waste that trust. The best companies don't just collect feedback. They turn it into visible change. They show customers their voice matters. They build trust through action. Start small: 1. Pick one feedback channel 2. Create a clear process 3. Act quickly on insights 4. Show results 5. Scale what works Your customers are talking. Are you really listening? More importantly, are you acting? What's your approach to customer feedback? How do you close the loop? ------------------ ▶️ Want to see more content like this and also connect with other CS & SaaS enthusiasts? You should join Tidbits. We do short round-ups a few times a week to help you learn what it takes to be a top-notch customer success professional. Join 1999+ community members! 💥 [link in the comments section]
-
User Feedback Loops: the missing piece in AI success? AI is only as good as the data it learns from -- but what happens after deployment? Many businesses focus on building AI products but miss a critical step: ensuring their outputs continue to improve with real-world use. Without a structured feedback loop, AI risks stagnating, delivering outdated insights, or losing relevance quickly. Instead of treating AI as a one-and-done solution, companies need workflows that continuously refine and adapt based on actual usage. That means capturing how users interact with AI outputs, where it succeeds, and where it fails. At Human Managed, we’ve embedded real-time feedback loops into our products, allowing customers to rate and review AI-generated intelligence. Users can flag insights as: 🔘Irrelevant 🔘Inaccurate 🔘Not Useful 🔘Others Every input is fed back into our system to fine-tune recommendations, improve accuracy, and enhance relevance over time. This is more than a quality check -- it’s a competitive advantage. - for CEOs & Product Leaders: AI-powered services that evolve with user behavior create stickier, high-retention experiences. - for Data Leaders: Dynamic feedback loops ensure AI systems stay aligned with shifting business realities. - for Cybersecurity & Compliance Teams: User validation enhances AI-driven threat detection, reducing false positives and improving response accuracy. An AI model that never learns from its users is already outdated. The best AI isn’t just trained -- it continuously evolves.
-
A loyal, multi‑year client ends a retainer with barely a goodbye email. Projects hit deadlines, budgets held, and yet the relationship still slipped away... In agency land, client churn rarely arrives as a dramatic flare‑up. More often it is a quiet drift: Slack threads go cold, the next‑quarter brief never shows, and the renewal line stays blank. The danger is that it feels painless until you add up the lost lifetime value, the scramble to backfill revenue, and the referrals that were never even requested. Silent churn hides in the gap between delivery and relationship management. Whenever “no news” is mistaken for “all good,” the countdown has already started. Let's apply a systems approach as we would across our Barrel Holdings agencies: The silent‑churn autopsy: - No quarterly business reviews (QBRs) or formal check‑ins - Value delivered wasn’t documented or celebrated - Leadership lacked a dashboard for account health - Post‑project follow‑ups never happened - Referral and expansion opportunities quietly died on the vine 1. Map the breakdown: - Missing QBR rhythm, feedback loops, health scorecards - No early‑warning indicators or escalation paths - No structured post‑delivery cadence to drive referrals 2. Re‑ground the team in core fundamentals: - Communicate exceptionally: relationships need rituals - Surface value: delivered work must be made visible - Define “healthy” clearly: simple, shared success metrics - Learn fast: lost clients become internal case studies, not mysteries 3. Fix the operational gaps: - Launch quarterly client feedback surveys (explore NPS + open prompts) - Add project debriefs/AARs as a mandatory close‑out step - Assign strategic sponsors to top‑tier accounts and track health scores in a live dashboard - Standardize a QBR template: goals, wins, upcoming risks, growth ideas 4. Reinforce with structure, rhythm, visibility, incentives, feedback: - Every key account has an owner responsible for retention insights - QBRs and health‑score reviews run every quarter, no skips - Account dashboards shared in weekly leadership meetings - Retention metrics baked into performance reviews and shout‑outs - Client survey results drive immediate tweaks to delivery SOPs 5. Watch the ripple effects: - AMs may need coaching to lead strategic conversations - PMs tie delivery metrics to client value, not just deadlines - Strong retention fuels referrals and upsells, compounding growth Success looks like: - 100% of top‑tier clients receive a QBR every quarter - Live health scores flag at‑risk accounts before contracts lapse - Churn rate drops, referral revenue climbs - Relationship health becomes a line item in every leadership review - Silent churn ends when relationship stewardship is systemized, not left to chance. == 🟢 Find this useful? Subscribe to AgencyHabits for weekly systems‑thinking insights. The full Agency Systems Playbook drops in May—subscribers get first access.
-
We used to spend 10+ hours a week reviewing client calls. Now? We know exactly what went wrong or right in under 60 seconds. Here’s how we built a post-call feedback loop without ever hitting “play.” I got tired of sitting through 45 minute call recordings and honestly, it’s just too much time to flag a 30-second mistake. So we set up a simple workflow that turns call transcripts into coaching triggers, and flags what matters, without someone manually listening to hours of recordings. 👇 How it works: 1️⃣ Call ends → Zapier picks it up 2️⃣ Transcript pulled → via Fathom 3️⃣ Call type tagged → onboarding, strategy, escalation, etc. 4️⃣ Logic applied → using GPT inside Clay 5️⃣ Red flags + feedback generated 6️⃣ Post-call coaching assigned → based on who led the call 7️⃣ Team alerted → via Slack 8️⃣ Tracker updated → Google Sheets logs it all We no longer rely on memory, scattered notes, or post-call rants to know what went wrong (or right). Now, every important call becomes a system: → Good moments are shared and scaled → Gaps are flagged early → Coaching is targeted, based on real-time gaps and what moves the needle for us It’s a game-changer for: ✅ SDR enablement ✅ CSM consistency ✅ Strategy calls with more structure ✅ Escalation calls with less chaos No extra effort and no micromanaging. Just a system that listens better than we ever could. If your team handles a high volume of client calls, and things are slipping through the cracks, start here. The gold is already in the transcript. You just need a smarter way to mine it. Want a peek at the workflow? Drop a comment and I’ll share the exact setup. #outboundautomation #clay #enablement
-
“This step in your process takes longer than we expected. Could it be simpler and faster?” Recently, one of our customers gave us this piece of feedback. At first, it may feel like a minor comment. But when we dug deeper, we realized that they weren’t just talking about saving some time. It was about how customers overall experienced working with us in terms of speed, trust, and ease of doing business. That one feedback helped us shift our strategy a bit and improve the entire process for everyone. ➡️ We re-mapped our workflow, invested in technology that reduced friction and changed our communication style to be more proactive. The result? A smoother customer journey and a team that now takes feedback not as criticism but as an opportunity to keep doing better. Here’s what we learned about building a feedback loop: 1️⃣Listen actively – Even “small” feedback may hide a bigger pattern. 2️⃣Close the loop – Tell customers what you did with their input. It builds trust. 3️⃣Make it systemic – Don’t just fix an issue, redesign the process so it doesn’t happen again. A single insight can spark a change for the better if we’re willing to act. What about you? Have you ever received feedback that helped you transform your processes? And did you work willingly on it? #CustomerFeedback #ContinuousImprovement #CustomerExperience
-
Most professionals optimize for efficiency. Few optimize for decision velocity. The real game-changer? Mastering "closed-loop execution." Top operators design feedback-integrated workflows, turning every decision into a data-driven iteration cycle. This isn’t just about getting things done. It’s about refining how things get done in real time. Here’s how it works: 1️⃣ Feedback is embedded into execution. → Every critical task triggers an immediate debrief, before moving on. 2️⃣ Decisions are time-boxed, not open-ended. → 80% of decisions should be made within a predetermined response window (e.g., 24-48h). 3️⃣ Constraints are logged, not ignored. → Every friction point is documented and fed back into the system. 4️⃣ Iteration happens on a cadence. → Adjustments are scheduled in fixed review cycles (daily, weekly, quarterly). 5️⃣ Action loops are closed systematically. → Every insight is either applied or discarded, nothing sits in limbo. Why? Most businesses rely on delayed feedback loops. High-impact teams build instant iteration cycles into their workflow. 🔹 Instead of post-mortems, they run preemptive course corrections. 🔹 Instead of endless deliberation, they prioritize speed-to-decision. 🔹 Instead of reviewing in hindsight, they refine in real-time. This is how innovation compounds, not by thinking more, but by thinking faster. Quick Application: 📌 Set fixed decision response times (e.g., 24h max for non-critical moves). 📌 Tag & categorize constraints, don’t just “note them.” 📌 Run a “what slowed us down” review at the end of each execution cycle. 📌 Ensure every decision has a feedback loop, no insights get lost. This single shift can 10x execution speed without sacrificing accuracy. 💬 What’s your approach to rapid iteration? Do you time-box decisions or rely on traditional review cycles? Drop your take below. 👇 🔁 Repost this if you think faster iteration beats slow perfection. 📩 Follow for more high-performance execution frameworks.
-
Your Best Business Consultant Might Be Your Own Customer One of my clients was losing customers faster than they could onboard new ones. Support tickets were piling up. Churn rate kept rising. The issue wasn’t the product, it was silence. They weren’t listening to the right people. So we built a Customer Feedback Loop System in just 3 steps: ↳ Step 1: Capture the Voice of the Customer. We set up exit surveys, automated feedback requests post-purchase, and a suggestion box on the website. ↳ Step 2: Organize the Data. We categorized all feedback into themes: speed, communication, usability, etc. This revealed patterns the team had never noticed. ↳ Step 3: Act on It, Fast. We implemented changes WEEKLY, not monthly. One minor tweak to onboarding alone dropped support tickets by 40%. Within 2 months, their NPS jumped by 27 points. More importantly? Customers started referring others, because they felt heard. The truth is: Every business problem is a communication problem first. And the best fixes often come from the people already using your service. Want to build a feedback loop that actually improves retention and experience? Grab my free Customer Feedback System Builder guide, I walk you through exactly how to set it up in your business. Link is in the comment section below. This is what I help small business owners do; build systems that turn feedback into fuel for growth and customer loyalty. #systems #leadership #business #strategy #ProcessImprovement
-
“CRO gurus” brag about secret hacks while ignoring the only voice that matters: your customer’s. If an agency talks heat-maps before they talk to actual humans, close the google meet. Conversion Rate Optimization is really just User Experience with a profit motive. Strip out the friction, let people buy in peace, watch revenue climb. Simple, right? Yet most teams guess instead of listen. Here’s what listening looks like in the real world: 👉🏼 User-testing recordings - we pay shoppers to fumble through your store, capture every sigh, rage-click, and confused pause, then fix the mess. 👉🏼 Review mining - thousands of product reviews sliced open to reveal the pain points and purchase triggers your marketing should be hammering down. 👉🏼 Post-purchase surveys - a single question at checkout: “What almost stopped you from buying?” Their answers write our next test plan. 👉🏼 Deep-dive email surveys - offer a perk, get paragraph-long confessions about fears, motivations, and unmet needs your competitors never see. 👉🏼 Customer-support tickets - your help desk is a goldmine of bugs and friction. We harvest it and wipe out low-hanging blockers fast. This is professional CRO: start with problems users face, solve them on the site, and let Shopify's cash register sing. So, next time an “expert” flashes a fancy GA4 funnel diagram, ask one question: “How many hours have you spent listening to my customers?” If the answer is zero, you already know what to do.